Belay Reddick v. Mary Mitchell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Belay Reddick v. Mary Mitchell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7043

BELAY REDDICK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARY M. MITCHELL; JOSEPH NEAL; R. KELSO; S. LATHROP,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-02487-DCN)

Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 23, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Belay Reddick, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Belay Reddick appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,

403 U.S. 388

(1971).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Reddick v. Mitchell, No. 2:10-cv-02487-DCN (D.S.C. July

20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished