Belay Reddick v. Mary Mitchell
Belay Reddick v. Mary Mitchell
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-7043
BELAY REDDICK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARY M. MITCHELL; JOSEPH NEAL; R. KELSO; S. LATHROP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-02487-DCN)
Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 23, 2011
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Belay Reddick, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Belay Reddick appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388(1971).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Reddick v. Mitchell, No. 2:10-cv-02487-DCN (D.S.C. July
20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished