Charles Rash v. Patricia Stansberry

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Charles Rash v. Patricia Stansberry

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7118

CHARLES E. RASH, a/k/a Charles Emmanuel Rash,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:10-cv-00836-HEH)

Submitted: December 20, 2011 Decided: December 23, 2011

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Emmanuel Rash, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Charles E. Rash, a federal prisoner, appeals the

district court’s order denying relief on his

28 U.S.C.A. § 2241

(West 2006 & Supp. 2011) petition. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. Rash v. Stansberry, No. 3:10-cv-

00836-HEH (E.D. Va. July 22, 2011). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished