U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Fake v. Warden

Fake v. Warden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 4, 2011 · Hamilton, Keenan, Niemeyer
406 F. App'x 771

Fake v. Warden

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tina M. Fake appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West 2006 & Supp. 2010) habeas petition. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Fake’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Fake has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Further, we deny Fake’s motion for a certificate of appealability. We dispense with *772oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.