U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Paul

United States v. Paul
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 19, 2011 · King, Motz, Wynn
407 F. App'x 705

United States v. Paul

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Xavier Marcellus Paul appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Paul, No. 1:98-cr-00192-JCC-4 (E.D. Va. June 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.