U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Coleman v. Stevenson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 19, 2011 · King, Motz, Wynn

407 F. App'x 709

Counsel

Richard L. Coleman, Appellant Pro Se. James M. Davis, Jr., Joel Steve Hughes, Davidson & Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision. The 2 that cite it most often are listed here.

Davis v. Freeman (District Court, D. South Carolina 2024)
Singleton v. Georgetown, City of (District Court, D. South Carolina 2021)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard L. Coleman appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Coleman v. Stevenson, No. *7100:09-cv-00872-HMH, 2010 WL 2990740 (D.S.C. July 26, 2010). We also deny Coleman’s motions to place the appeal in abeyance, and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.