Martin v. Lott

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit January 18, 2011

Martin v. Lott, 407 F. App'x 761 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carlos Edward Martin appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in part to defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin v. Lott, No. 3:07-cv-03782-JFA, 2010 WL 547175 (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Carlos Edward MARTIN, Plaintiff—Appellant, and Tashiana Anita Martin v. Leon LOTT, as Representative for the Office of the Richmond County Sheriff's Department Deputy Ben Fields, in his individual capacity as deputy with the Richland County Sheriff's Department Deputy Joseph Clark, in his individual capacity as deputy with the Richland County Sheriff's Department, Defendants—Appellees
Status: Published