Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, 409 F. App'x 651 (4th Cir. 2011)

Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bradley Carl Brown appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 5:08-cv-00083-FPS-JE S, 2009 WL 5098082 (ND.W.Va. Dec. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Bradley Carl BROWN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS Harley G. Lappin, Warden Al Haynes, Warden D.E. Gill, Associate Warden Harold Taylor, Associate Warden V. Dupuis, S.I.S. Lieutenant D. Murphy, Lieutenant
Status
Published