Cleveland v. Seneca SC
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
George Cleveland appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on Cleveland’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and a subsequent order denying Cleveland’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cleveland v. Seneca SC, No. 8:09-cv-00626-HMH, 2010 WL 1257566 (D.S.C. Mar. 23, 2010; 2010 WL 1462759, Apr. 9, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- George CLEVELAND v. SENECA SC, CITY OF Bonnie L. Moses, individually and in her official capacity as election manager, director, poll worker for the City of Seneca SC Rick Lacey, individually and in his official capacity as Seneca Recreation Department Director Terry F. Mullikin, individually and in his official capacity as groundsman employed by the Seneca Recreation Department Ronnie O'Kelly, Mayor Pro Tem for the City of Seneca individually and in his official capacity Seneca Police Department John Covington, individually and in his official capacity as Police Chief for the City of Seneca John Does, in their official capacity as Police Officers for the City of Seneca
- Cited By
- 3 cases
- Status
- Published