U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Baker

United States v. Baker
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 14, 2011 · Duncan, King, Motz
410 F. App'x 646

United States v. Baker

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jay Emmitt Baker appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion for a reduction in sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Baker, No. 4:07-cr-00642-TLW-l (D.S.C. Nov. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.