U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Hinton v. Reavis

Hinton v. Reavis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 14, 2011 · Davis, King, Wilkinson
410 F. App'x 647

Hinton v. Reavis

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Henderson L. Hinton appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) action against Defendants and has moved for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hinton’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court’s judgment. See Hinton v. Reavis, No. 5:07-ct-03057-D (E.D.N.C. May 25, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.