Flanigan v. Panaguiten

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 17, 2011

Flanigan v. Panaguiten, 411 F. App'x 604 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Brunell Flanigan appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed *605the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Flanigan’s motion to supplement the record, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Flanigan v. Panaguiten, No. 2:08-cv-00169-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Feb. 2, 2010 & entered Feb. 3, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Michael Brunell FLANIGAN v. Elizabeth PANAGUITEN, MLP J.D. Allen, Clinical Director Vanessa P. Adams, Warden Harrell Watts, Administrator National Inmate Appeals Kim White, Southeast Regional Director Y. Aponte, Assistant Health Services Administrator S. Desrochers, and United States of America, General Accounting Office Federal Bureau of Prisons
Status: Published