U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Mitchell v. Loyen

Mitchell v. Loyen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 28, 2011 · Gregory, Keenan, Shedd
412 F. App'x 630

Mitchell v. Loyen

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Danita Mitchell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing her civil rights complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Mitchell’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Mitchell has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.