Galeas v. Neely

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 23, 2011

Galeas v. Neely, 412 F. App'x 650 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jorge Galeas, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Galeas v. Neely, No. *6513:10-cv-00599-RJC, 2010 WL 4975497 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Jorge GALEAS, Jr., a/k/a Jorge Gevara, Plaintiff—Appellant, and Delmas M. Burch Ryan Shipwash Travis Locklear Artis Tamar Perkins v. Richard NEELY, Defendant—Appellee
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published