Taccino v. Bank of America

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Taccino v. Bank of America, 413 F. App'x 627 (4th Cir. 2011)

Taccino v. Bank of America

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James R. Taccino and Jane É. Taccino appeal the district court’s order dismissing their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Bank of America, No. 1:10-cv-00316-JFM (D.Md. Sept. 2, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
James R. TACCINO Jane E. Taccino v. BANK OF AMERICA, Countrywide Home Loans Assignee Union First Mortgage, a/k/a DAV Law Enterprises, broker for Countrywide
Status
Published