Sewell v. Green

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 28, 2011

Sewell v. Green, 413 F. App'x 668 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Emmanuel Edward Sewell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sewell v. Green, No. 8:08-cv-01027-DKC, 2010 WL 583919 (D.Md. Feb. 16, 2010). *669We deny Sewell’s motion to appoint counsel.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Sewell has filed a document entitled "Motion of Issues on Appeal of the Lower Courts [sic] Judgment” that appears to be his brief on appeal. We deny the motion.

Reference

Full Case Name: Emmanuel Edward SEWELL, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Kathleen GREEN Michael King Brian Romines Zock, Sergeant Westbrook, Officer Ragins, Officer Garrisey, Officer Barnes, Lieutenant Johnson, Lieutenant Walter Holmes, Captain Unidentified Black Officer Five Unknown Officers, Defendants—Appellees, and Warden
Status: Published