U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Marshall

United States v. Marshall
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 3, 2011 · Gregory, Keenan, Shedd
414 F. App'x 526

United States v. Marshall

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kalvin Marshall appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Marshall, No. 3:02-cr-00225-HEH-2 (E.D.Va. Sept. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.