Armstrong v. Green

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit March 3, 2011

Armstrong v. Green, 414 F. App'x 535 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Corey V. Armstrong, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Armstrong v. Green, No. 1:08-cv-00342-WDQ, 2010 WL 5285313 (D.Md. Dec. 17, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *536materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Corey V. ARMSTRONG v. Kathleen GREEN, Warden (E.C.I) Lt. Hayward, (E.C.I) Wisenoff, Case Manager (E.C.I) Gary D. Maynard, Secretary of D.P.S.C.S. J. Michael Stouffer, Commissioner of Corrections John Rowley, Warden (N.B.C.I) James K. Holwager, Ph. D. (N.B.C.I.) Richard Graham, Asst. Warden (N.B.C.I) Liller, Case Manager Supervisor (N.B.C.I) Durst, Case Manager 1-9
Status: Published