U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

In re Adams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 1, 2011 · Agee, Hamilton, Wilkinson

420 F. App'x 228

Counsel

Derrick Alexander Adams, Petitioner Pro Se.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Antonio Waters v. State of Indiana (Ind. Ct. App. 2016)
Henderson v. Commonwealth (Va. 2013)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derrick Alexander Adams petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his “Motion to Clarify and/or for Amend Mistake in Judgment.” He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court dismissed the motion on February 2, 2011, 2011 WL 381562. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.