U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Pryce v. Board of Education of Prince George's County

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 11, 2011

422 F. App'x 229

Counsel

Thomas B. Corbin, Thomas B. Corbin, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Linda Hitt Thatcher, Robert J. Baror, Thatcher Law Firm, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

West Virginia Dept. of Transportation v. Margaret Z. Newton (W. Va. 2015)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Peter Pryce appeals the magistrate judge’s order entering judgment for the Appellee following the jury’s verdict in favor of the Appellee on Pryce’s claim of retaliation. As Pryce failed to file a post-verdict motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50, and failed to move for a new trial pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59, however, this court is without power to review his claim regarding the sufficiency of the evidence. See Unitherm Food Sys., Inc. v. Swift-Eckrich, Inc., 546 U.S. 394, 400-07, 126 S.Ct. 980, 163 L.Ed.2d 974 (2006); see also A Helping Hand, LLC v. Baltimore County, 515 F.3d 356, 369-70 (4th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, we affirm the magistrate judge’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.