U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Briscoe

United States v. Briscoe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 3, 2011
427 F. App'x 250

United States v. Briscoe

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Richard Donnell Briscoe appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Briscoe, No. 8:04-cr-00559-AW-l (D.Md. Nov. 4, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.