U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Clark

United States v. Clark
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 2, 2011 · Davis, Keenan, Wynn
428 F. App'x 228

United States v. Clark

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael A. Clark appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Clark, No. 3:00-cr-00244-REP-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 12, 2010). We deny Clark’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.