Hurst v. City of Salisbury
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jerry A. Hurst appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hurst v. City of Salisbury, Md., No. 1:10-cv-02516-WDQ, 2010 WL 4103682 (D.Md. Oct. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jerry A. HURST, Plaintiff—Appellant v. CITY OF SALISBURY, MARYLAND Chief Webster Captain Wiley Officer Smullen, in their individual and official capacities State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Marshall Major Marty A. Harbin John D. Mcgavin Maxwell Huddleston Wiegard Guy M. Harbert, III Does 1-50, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants—Appellees
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published