U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Thompson v. Wade

Thompson v. Wade
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 1, 2011 · Diaz, King, Shedd
433 F. App'x 153

Thompson v. Wade

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Paul Cleveland Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no . reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thompson v. Wade, No. 2:10-cv-00174-RBS-TEM (E.D.Va. Jan. 18, 2011). We deny Thompson’s motion for a declaratory judgment and for a preliminary and a permanent injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.