U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Richardson v. Gray

Richardson v. Gray
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 2, 2011 · Davis, Keenan, Niemeyer
433 F. App'x 176

Richardson v. Gray

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mike Anthony Richardson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Captain Gray, No. 4:08-cv-03539-RBH, 2010 WL 4809429 (D.S.C. Nov. 19, 2010). We deny Richardson’s motions to appoint counsel and for a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.