U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Hawkins

United States v. Hawkins
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 2, 2011 · Davis, Duncan, Niemeyer
433 F. App'x 182

United States v. Hawkins

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Sylvester Hawkins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error because, as a career offender, Hawkins’ offense level was determined based on his status as a career offender, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1, rather than on relevant conduct under USSG § 2Dl.l(c). Amendment 706 of the Guidelines did not impact § 4B1.1. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.