U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Lurz v. Galley

Lurz v. Galley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 22, 2011 · Duncan, Hamilton, King
436 F. App'x 143

Lurz v. Galley

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jay Timothy Lurz appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lurz v. Galley, No. 1:09-cv-02664-PJM, 2011 WL 502858 (D.Md. Feb. 10, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.