U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Franklin v. Johns

Franklin v. Johns
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 30, 2011 · Diaz, Keenan, Wynn
436 F. App'x 210

Counsel

John Franklin, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Bredenberg, Office of the United States Attorney; Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina; Christina Ann Kelley, Bureau of Prisons, Butner, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Franklin v. Johns

Cases that cite this one

12 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Franklin appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Franklin v. Johns, No. 5:09-cb-03023-D (E.D.N.C. Jan. 18, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.