U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Deal v. Hicks

Deal v. Hicks
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 2, 2011 · Agee, Diaz, Shedd
441 F. App'x 978

Deal v. Hicks

Opinion of the Court

*979Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roger Lee Deal, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Deal v. Hicks, No. 5:10-ct-03195-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.