U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Jarvis v. Fedex Office & Print Services, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 2, 2011 · Hamilton, Keenan, Niemeyer

442 F. App'x 71

Counsel

Derek N. Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. David Samuel Panzer, Eric C. Rowe, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Jarvis v. United States (United States Court of Federal Claims 2021)
Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Services, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 2012)
Butler v. DirectSAT USA, LLC (District Court, D. Maryland 2012)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Derek N. Jarvis appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider and granting summary judgment against him in his civil action. On appeal, Jarvis contests the denial of his *72motion to reconsider the court’s earlier denial of his spoliation of evidence claim, and the denial of his claim of discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jarvis v. FedEx Office & Print Servs., Inc., No. 08-1694, 2011 WL 826796 (D.Md. Mar. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.