U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

In re Valderrama

In re Valderrama
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 11, 2011 · Niemeyer, Shedd, Wilkinson
442 F. App'x 828

In re Valderrama

Opinion of the Court

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Rafael Valderrama petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2011) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court has recently resolved Valderra-ma’s § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court has decided Valderrama’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma*829terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.