Thomas v. Ajala
Thomas v. Ajala
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In these consolidated appeals, Titus Thomas challenges the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights complaints. We have reviewed the record and conclude that there is no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Ajala, No. 8:10-cv-02090-AW, 2011 WL 743838 (D.Md. Feb. 23, 2011); Thomas v. Wilson, No. 8:10-cv-02003-AW, 2011 WL 195655 (D.Md. Jan. 20, 2011). We dispense with
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.