U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

King v. Bennett

King v. Bennett
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 30, 2011 · Duncan, Keenan, Motz
444 F. App'x 686

King v. Bennett

Opinion of the Court

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Louretha King seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing her claims in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action involving multiple parties. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order King seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.