U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

In re Hunt

In re Hunt
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 1, 2011 · Gregory, Hamilton, Niemeyer
445 F. App'x 705

In re Hunt

Opinion of the Court

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael Eugene Hunt petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights complaint. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.