U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Riffin v. Friedman

Riffin v. Friedman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 13, 2011 · Gregory, King, Motz
446 F. App'x 614

Riffin v. Friedman

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Riffin appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting the Trustee’s motion for approval of a settlement agreement, to cooperate to obtain access to a letter of credit, and to modify, as necessary, the automatic stay, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Riffin v. Friedman, Nos. 1:10-cv-02618-CCB; 10-11248-DK (D.Md. Feb. 7, 2011). We dis*615pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.