Glaser v. Enzo Biochem, Inc.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Lawrence F. Glaser appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60 and motion for sanctions, which were filed in his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Glaser v. Enzo Biochem, Inc., No. 1:02-cv-01242-GBL (E.D.Va. Apr. 7, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Lawrence F. GLASER, individually and on behalf of Kimberly, Erin, Hannah and Benjamin Glaser, and Maureen Glaser, individually and on behalf of Kimberly, Erin, Hannah and Benjamin Glaser v. ENZO BIOCHEM, INCORPORATED Heiman Gross Barry Weiner Elazar Rabbani Sharim Rabbani John Delucca Dean Engelhardt, and Richard Keating Doug Yates John Doe, 1-50
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published