Bryan v. Tatarsky
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed in unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
T. Terell Bryan appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and granting Appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bryan v. Tatarsky, No. 1:08-cv-03556-TLW, 2011 WL 380070 (D.S.C. Feb. 3, 2011). We also deny Bryan’s pending motion to produce. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- T. Terell BRYAN, a/k/a Terence Bryan, a/k/a Terence Terell Bryan v. D. TATARSKY OFC Buehler IGC Cocciolone Mr. Najjar Asst. Warden Claytor Warden McCall M. Carolina Lindsey James Simmons, III, and SCDC IGC
- Status
- Published