Ojeda v. Procter
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jonathan Ojeda appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ojeda v. Proctor, No. 2:10-cv-00126-JPB-DJJ, 2011 WL 2433359 (N.D. W. Va. June 16, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Jonathan OJEDA, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Dr. PROCTER, sued individually and as an Agent of Wexford Medical Sources Tristen Tenny, sued individually and as Agent of Wexford Medical Resources Adrian Hoke, sued individually and in his Official Capacity Wexford Medical Sources, sued as a Corporation, working within the State of West Virginia, Defendants—Appellees
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published