Veiga v. Suntrust Bank

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit October 17, 2011

Veiga v. Suntrust Bank, 450 F. App'x 269 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion of the Court

*270Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Aaron Holsey appeals the order of the magistrate judge approving the settlement of this class action lawsuit and rejecting Holse/s objection to the settlement. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Veiga, v. Holsey, No. 1:09-cv-02815-PWG (D. Md. filed Feb. 23, 2011, entered Feb. 24, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Joseph V. VEIGA, III Susan M. Veiga, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated Mary Kendall, Plaintiffs—Appellees v. SUNTRUST BANK v. Aaron Holsey, Movant —
Status: Published