Tarpley v. Trenum
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Steven E. Tarpley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tarpley v. Trenum, No. 1:10-cv-02140-BEL (D.Md. filed June 1, 2011, and entered June 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Steven E. TARPLEY v. Charlene Hetty TRENUM Isais Tessema, and J. Michael Stouffer, Commissioner David Barthalow Frederick Nastri Albert Earl Davis Jon Galley Bobby Shearin Frank Bishop, Jr. Donald Crowe Douglas Devore Tinnele Winters Robert M. Friend Ketterman, Lieutenant O.W. Creek W.D. Slate Robert Huff B.A. Wilt John Doe, Sgt., H.U.-4 M.B. Garrison S. Winebrenner Jeffrey Shimko Jeremy Linaburg R. Gover R. Graham O.K. Berry James Beeman R. Shields R. Goss Milaney Liller Barbara Newlon Kathleen Greene, Warden Bruce Bozman Lt. Galligher Major Maycock Tyler, Capt., Mailroom Supervisor Persinger Scott S. Oakley
- Status
- Published