Lagana v. Tessema

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Lagana v. Tessema, 454 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2011)

Lagana v. Tessema

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Lagaña appeals the district court’s order granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lagana’s motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lagana v. Tessema, No. 8:10-cv-03493-PJM, 2011 WL 3608204 (D.Md. Aug. 15, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Joseph LAGANA, Plaintiff—Appellant v. Doctor TESSEMA Colin Ottey, Doctor Beverly Sparks, P.A. PA Flury R.N. Bill Delores Adams, R.N. Don Janice Gilmore, Defendants—Appellees
Status
Published