Marshall v. Lappin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Marshall v. Lappin, 456 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2011)

Marshall v. Lappin

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

La’Ron Marshall appeals the district court’s orders: accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971); and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Lappin, No. 2:10-cv-00003-JPB-DJJ, 2010 WL 5418929 (N.D. W. Va. Dec. 23, 2010); (Feb. 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
La'Ron MARSHALL v. Harley LAPPIN, Director of the BOP K.M. White, Mid-Atlantic Regional Dir. James Cross, Warden USP Hazelton Debbie Lohr, DHO Official of USP-Hazelton Constance Reese, Warden FCI Talladega
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published