U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

In re Salazar

In re Salazar
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 19, 2011 · Davis, Gregory, Shedd
458 F. App'x 261

In re Salazar

Opinion of the Court

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Martin F. Salazar petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his pending motions. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court recently denied the motions. Accordingly, because the district court has already ruled, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.