U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Sindram v. Robelen

Sindram v. Robelen
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 19, 2011 · Davis, Gregory, Shedd
458 F. App'x 263

Sindram v. Robelen

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Sindram appeals the district court’s order enjoining him from filing further civil actions in the district court without receiving pre-filing authorization. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sindram v. Robelen, No. 1:09-cv-01082-GBL-IDD (E.D.Va. Aug. 19, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.