Young v. Thompson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit December 20, 2011

Young v. Thompson, 458 F. App'x 291 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Arnold Young appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying *292relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Young v. Thompson, No. 2:10-cv-00066-JPB-JSK, 2011 WL 3297493 (N.D.W.Va. July 29, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: Larry Arnold YOUNG, Plaintiff—Appellant v. D. THOMPSON, Correctional Officer Duranko, S.I.S. Technician D. Shaw, Lieutenant Unknown Mail Room Personnel D. Yost, I.S.O., Defendants—Appellees
Status: Published