Daye v. Ballard
Opinion of the Court
Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Cornell F. Daye seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing certain counts in Daye’s 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2006) complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 387 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Daye seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Cornell F. DAYE, Plaintiff—Appellant v. David BALLARD, Warden (MOCC), in his official and individual capacities (Defendant 1) Jason Collins, Associate Warden of Programs, in official and individual capacities (Defendant 2) Mark Crawford, Librarian, in his official and individual capacities (Defendant 3) Lt. Curtis Dixon, in his official and individual capacities (Defendant 4)
- Status
- Published