Brightwell v. Whitney

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit December 20, 2011

Brightwell v. Whitney, 459 F. App'x 219 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion of the Court

*220Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David Brightwell appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brightwell v. Whitney, No. 8:11-cv-01652-DKC (D.Md. Aug. 80, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name: David BRIGHTWELL v. D. Scott WHITNEY, Chief Attorney Geraldine K. Sweeney, Chief Attorney Governor Martin O'Malley Somerset County Administrator, Defendants—Appellees
Status: Published