U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

United States v. Alston

United States v. Alston
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2011 · Diaz, Duncan, Motz
459 F. App'x 248

United States v. Alston

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cedric Dante Alston appeals the district court’s order denying his motions to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Alston’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Alston has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.