U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2011

Crosby v. Hamilton

Crosby v. Hamilton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 22, 2011 · Diaz, Duncan, Motz
459 F. App'x 282

Crosby v. Hamilton

Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory D. Crosby appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) for failure to pay the filing fee. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.* Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Crosby v. Hamilton, No. 7:11-cv-00181-JLK (W.D.Va. June 28, *2832011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

As the district court noted, Crosby is free to refile upon payment of the filing fee or production of the documentation needed to proceed in forma pauperis.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.