Metropolitan Property and Casualty v. Walter Holland, Jr.
Metropolitan Property and Casualty v. Walter Holland, Jr.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1372
METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
WALTER J. HOLLAND, JR.,
Party-in-Interest/Defendant–Appellant,
and
DAVID W. MCKAUGHAN,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00690-WMN)
Submitted: January 26, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert L. Siems, LAW FIRM OF ROBERT L. SIEMS, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Stacey A. Moffet, Richard J. Berwanger, Jr., ECCLESTON & WOLF, P.C., Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Walter J. Holland, Jr. appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment for the Appellee on its claim
for a declatory judgment. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Metro. Prop. and Cas. Ins. Co. v.
Holland, No. 1:10-cv-00690-WMN (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2011). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished