Metropolitan Property and Casualty v. Walter Holland, Jr.
Metropolitan Property and Casualty v. Walter Holland, Jr.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1372
METROPOLITAN PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. WALTER J. HOLLAND, JR., Party-in-Interest/Defendant–Appellant, and DAVID W. MCKAUGHAN, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00690-WMN)
Submitted: January 26, 2012 Decided: February 2, 2012
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert L. Siems, LAW FIRM OF ROBERT L. SIEMS, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Stacey A. Moffet, Richard J. Berwanger, Jr., ECCLESTON & WOLF, P.C., Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Walter J. Holland, Jr. appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the Appellee on its claim for a declatory judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Metro. Prop. and Cas. Ins. Co. v. Holland, No. 1:10-cv-00690-WMN (D. Md. Mar. 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.